Globalaw - Home
ContactMember Login
Our social network
Container ship on globe
press

Incoterms and Tariff Mitigation

By Stefan Marc Kuuskne - Gardiner Roberts LLP, 03 Mar 2025

An increasingly complex landscape for international trade is presenting new challenges for cross-border business. Geopolitical tensions, fluctuating tariffs, and diverging trade policies have introduced significant uncertainty for buyers and sellers internationally. The prospect of increased tariffs disrupts pricing expectations and predictability around international commercial arrangements. In this environment, the mitigation and management of potential tariff risks are paramount for cross-border businesses.

To this end, Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) are important tools to help mitigate risks associated with increased costs caused by tariffs. Incoterms are a set of globally standardized contractual terms used for risk and responsibility management between international commercial entities.

While Incoterms do not directly address tariffs themselves, they can be used to allocate cost and payment obligations to minimize trade disruptions caused by tariffs.

BACKGROUND

Originally developed by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in 1936, Incoterms have evolved over time to address the changing demands of global trade. There are currently a set of eleven (11) internationally recognized Incoterms that are used to provide clarity and consistency in international trade contracts.

The latest iteration, Incoterms 2020, has been updated to reflect modern trade realities.

COMMON INCOTERMS AND TARIFF MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Some of the most common Incoterms used in commercial contracts for tariff mitigation strategies include:

1. Delivered Duty Paid (DDP)

In an unpredictable tariff environment, Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) is an ideal Incoterm for use by buyers seeking price certainty and risk protection from fluctuating tariffs.

Under DDP, the seller delivers goods cleared for import and ready for unloading at a named location. The seller is responsible for the costs and risks associated with final delivery, including the payment of tariffs.

DDP can assist buyers in uncertain tariff situations in multiple ways. Firstly, DDP provides price stabilization for the delivered goods by ensuring that the seller covers any import tariffs. This mitigates against price increases necessitated by changes in tariffs in the destination country. DDP also provides predictable costs by allowing the buyer to know the total landed cost before delivery. Finally, DDP can help to shield the buyer from uncertainty around the risk of increased tariffs during the transportation process. These factors make the use of DDP in commercial contracts particularly helpful for buyers by providing predictability around prices and costs.

2. Ex Works (EXW)

Ex Works (EXW) is an Incoterm that can be used by sellers who want to limit their tariff exposure. EXW is also helpful to buyers interested in managing tariff risks by taking advantage of potentially favorable tariff rates, depending on their location.

Under EXW, the seller ensures that goods are available for shipment at their premises, or another agreed-upon location. The buyer then assumes full responsibility for arranging shipment, transport and meeting customs regulations, including paying applicable tariffs in the importing country.

Under EXW, the seller’s responsibilities end once the goods are made available for transport, thereby limiting their tariff exposure. EXW also gives the buyer control to manage tariff risks based on their location. For example, if the buyer is located in a region with favorable tariff rates or subject to a free trade agreement, the buyer can import the goods at a lower tariff rate than may exist in other regions. EXW also presents opportunities for the buyer to arrange shipping routes with advantageous tariff rates.

3. Free on Board (FOB)

Free on Board (FOB) is technically an Incoterm applicable only to inland waterway transport but used commercially for other modes. FOB is particularly beneficial to sellers looking to minimize their tariff exposure throughout the shipping process.

Under FOB, the seller is only responsible for the costs of clearing goods for export and for their delivery onto a vessel for transport at a named port of departure. As soon as the goods are over the ship’s rail when loaded on to the transport vessel, the buyer becomes liable for risks and costs, including import clearance and tariff payment in the destination country.

Using FOB in commercial contracts minimizes the seller’s tariff risk. It also allows the buyer flexibility to take advantage of shipping destinations that may benefit from lower tariff rates and free trade agreements.

4. Free Carrier (FCA)

Free Carrier (FCA) is an Incoterm that provides flexibility to both the buyer and seller to collaborate on tariff mitigation strategies around advantageous delivery points that may benefit from lower tariff regions or trade agreements.

FCA allows the seller to deliver goods to a carrier at an agreed location, that can be chosen strategically to minimize tariffs for the buyer. Once transferred at the delivery point, the buyer assumes responsibility for import tariffs and customs clearance. FCA allows the buyer more control over customs procedures and can facilitate the use of shipping routes that minimize tariff exposure, depending on the agreed delivery point. Under FCA, both the seller and buyer can benefit from tariff risk minimization.

The use of Incoterms provides businesses with the opportunity to be proactive in managing commercial activities in the face of increasing tariff threats. Counsel can assist in identifying and implementing appropriate Incoterms to address specific considerations around optimizing supply chains, leveraging trade agreements and other risk allocation strategies to ensure smooth international transactions in the current global trade environment.

Latest News

news
03 May 2026

GLAPRM 2026 Recap: The Future of Legal Practice in APAC

The Globalaw APAC Regional Meeting (GLAPRM) took place April 15-18, 2026, at The Capitol Kempinski Hotel Singapore.

This year’s meeting theme focused on both emerging leaders and emerging legal topics, reflecting Globalaw’s commitment to positioning the network for lasting success by fostering and developing multi-jurisdictional and cross-generational relationships.

The collaboration between senior attorneys and young lawyers across our member firms broadened the conversation, strengthened peer-to-peer connections, and provided countless opportunities to learn from professionals at all levels.

We warmly thank our event sponsors, Legora, AESIS, and MDD, for helping us create a successful, memorable meeting!

Community Impact

During the meeting, the Globalaw Foundation made a $5,000 contribution to Pro Bono SG and heard remarks from Deputy CEO Chengying Cia. The largest pro bono legal organisation in Singapore, Pro Bono SG reflects the Globalaw Foundation’s mission of expanding access to justice by serving more than 16,000 vulnerable and disadvantaged individuals and organisations in FY24/25 through legal awareness, advice and advocacy.

Business & Social Programme Highlights

Image

Where to Next?

EMEA Regional Meeting, Berlin

GWI Annual Meeting, Poland

Annual Members Meeting, Omni Barton Creek Resort & Spa, Austin, Texas | Hosted by Jackson Walker

news
28 Apr 2026

Member Spotlight: DeBenedetti Majewski Szcześniak, Poland

DeBenedetti Majewski Szcześniak (DMS) is a distinguished Polish boutique law firm established in 2004 by C. David DeBenedetti, Dariusz Szcześniak, and Jarosław Majewski.

DMS was created to deliver the expertise, representation, and strategic business advisory services typical of a large firm, while providing the personalized attention and bespoke service of a boutique practice.

Rooted in trust and respect, DMS delivers comprehensive legal solutions for complex business challenges and projects demanding extensive knowledge and experience.

Business-Focused Outcomes

The firm seamlessly integrates dispute resolution and transactional advisory services, matching the caliber of international firms while ensuring greater accessibility and a more client-centric approach. DMS acts as a true business partner—responsible, precise, and fully attuned to each client’s objectives.

With a team of recognized experts and respected authorities, DMS combines deep legal expertise with practical, business-oriented solutions tailored to the needs of institutional and corporate clients.

Complex Subject Matter Experts

DMS specialises in corporate and commercial disputes, criminal and fiscal-criminal law, mergers and acquisitions and financial transactions.

The firm handles complex, multi-layered, and often high-profile matters for leading Polish and international financial institutions, insurance companies, banking and financial entities, investment funds, and companies across technology, real estate, and manufacturing sectors.

Thoughtful, Innovative Solutions

DMS is renowned for delivering thoughtful, innovative legal solutions that empower clients to strengthen their market position, achieve their goals, and effectively manage legal risk.

By integrating litigation and transactional expertise to provide legal support that truly advances business interests, DMS serves clients such as Fidera Group, Elliott Advisors (UK) Ltd, Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe, Uber, JP Morgan Securities Plc., ALLIANZ Global, Palram, Heiztechnik, and Schuler Pressen GmbH.

Clients benefit from DMS’s top-tier market precision, along with direct access to partners. The firm is consistently recognized by leading legal directories, including Chambers and Partners, Forbes, The Legal 500, and IFLR1000.

A 20-Year Globalaw History

For more than 20 years, DMS’s Globalaw membership has enabled the firm to address cross-border transactions and international disputes involving Poland. Founding partner C. David DeBenedetti is the President-elect of Globalaw, and the firm plays an active role in the network’s Sports Law Taskforce. This fall, DMS will host the Globalaw Women’s Initiative Meeting in Warsaw.

DMS works closely with Globalaw member firms worldwide, including those in the U.S., on complex regulatory matters (such as SEC compliance), providing clients with coordinated, multi-jurisdictional advice. In partnership with New York member firm Olshan, DMS advised on Polish and U.S. regulatory issues for a Polish investment fund. The firm also has a strong track record of collaboration with G.J. Pelaghias LLC in Cyprus, Cohen Amir-Aslani in France and MOLITOR in Luxembourg.

For more information, visit: https://dms-legal.com/en/

press
24 Apr 2026

Claims for Refund of Import Tariffs Collected by U.S. Authorities Under IEEPA

The article briefly analyses possible practical implications of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, which declared tariffs imposed by the President of the U.S. in 2025 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) unlawful and outlines the resulting refund claims for EU importers.

Shortly after taking office, the President of the U.S., based on IEEPA, issued Executive Order No. 14257, 90 Fed. Reg. 15041 (2025)¹ due to large and persistent deficits, which allegedly led to undermining of critical supply chains in the U.S.

On February 20th, 2026, the Supreme Court of the U.S. concluded in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump² with respect to tariffs based on IEEPA imposed on importers to the U.S. that “Fulfilling that role, we hold that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.”³

Based on the court’s opinion, IEEPA was designed to address extraordinary situations in national security and foreign policy by enabling economic measures such as sanctions. However, under the administration of the U.S. President, it was interpreted broadly to impose tariffs on imports⁴. The Supreme Court rejected this approach, emphasizing that tariff-setting authority belongs to Congress unless expressly delegated.

The Supreme Court of the U.S. stated that the President of the U.S. does not have the authority to unilaterally impose taxes and tariffs under IEEPA at will. On the contrary, the Supreme Court of the U.S. emphasized that to assert such extraordinary power (specifically unlimited amount, duration, and scope), the President of the U.S. must identify clear congressional authorization⁵.

The decision represents a significant development in U.S. tariffs and international trade law. The Supreme Court of the United States held that import tariffs imposed under the IEEPA lack a valid legal basis, as the statute does not authorize tariffs as a fiscal measure.

As a result, the tariffs collected under IEEPA are considered unlawful. The ruling could affect more than 300,000 importers and approximately USD 175 billion in tariffs⁶. In response, U.S. Customs and Border Protection has ceased collecting such tariffs and is addressing refund claims⁷.

Affected importers may seek refunds of tariffs paid without a legal basis. However, such claims must be actively pursued. Claimants need to identify relevant import transactions and substantiate the amounts paid, as also reflected in the underlying material.

In practice, claims are typically initiated through administrative procedures, with judicial proceedings available if necessary.

The decision has important implications for EU companies exporting to the U.S. While it creates a significant financial opportunity, successful recovery depends on timely action and proper legal strategy.

From a practical perspective, importers should assess their exposure by reviewing imports into the U.S., identifying tariffs paid, and evaluating recovery options. Given potential time limits, prompt action is advisable.

EU companies that imported goods into the U.S. during the relevant period April 2025 – February 2026 should promptly assess their position, secure the necessary documentation, and consider appropriate legal steps, including cooperation with U.S. counsel.

--

For more information, contact:

Image

JUDr. Norbert Havrila, Partner

LEGATE

www.legate.sk

--

¹Executive Order No. 14257 of President of the U.S. (https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-06063.pdf)

²Ruling of the Supreme Court of the U.S. in Nos. 24–1287 and 25–250 (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf)

³Article III (Pg. 20) of the Opinion of the Supreme Court of the U.S. in Nos. 24–1287 and 25–250;

⁴Article II.A.2  (Pg. 11 – 12) of the Opinion of the Supreme Court of the U.S. in Nos. 24–1287 and 25–250;

⁵Article III (Pg. 20) of the Opinion of the Supreme Court of the U.S. in Nos. 24–1287 and 25–250;

⁶PWM – University of Pennsylvania (https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/p/2026-02-20-supreme-court-tariff-ruling)

⁷Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) for IEEPA Refunds, April 20, 2026 Deployment (https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/4126a9c?reqfrom=share)

news
21 Apr 2026

Globalaw Foundation Donates $5,000 to Pro Bono SG During 2026 APAC Regional Meeting in Singapore

Globalaw, a leading network of approximately 80 independent law firms in over 60 countries, announces that the Globalaw Foundation presented a donation of $5,000 USD to Pro Bono SG during the 2026 Globalaw APAC Regional Meeting in Singapore.

The charity arm of The Law Society of Singapore, Pro Bono SG enables access to justice for the vulnerable and disadvantaged through legal awareness, advice, and advocacy. In FY24/25, the organization’s initiatives and programming served more than 16,000 individuals and organisations with a volunteer base of over 1,000.

“Pro Bono SG reflects the Globalaw Foundation’s mission of expanding access to justice by filling the gap for individuals and organisations that fall outside traditional legal aid resources,” said Peter J. Brown, Globalaw President and Partner at Edwards, Kenny & Bray. “We are proud to support their important work to protect and empower those who need it most.”

Donating to local charities is a fundamental component of Globalaw’s event programming. Representatives from selected nonprofits are also invited to meet and network with Globalaw member firms, helping them raise awareness of their organisations and build ongoing connections and engagement.

“We are thankful for being included in Globalaw’s APAC Regional Meeting and for the Foundation’s generous gift,” said Pro Bono SG Deputy CEO Chengying Cai, who accepted the donation in front of more than 100 guests during the event’s Welcome Reception at The Capitol Kempinski Hotel Singapore. “We truly appreciate the platform to showcase our work and meet the network.”

About The Globalaw Foundation

The Globalaw Foundation supports community organizations focused on helping young people access legal education and increasing access to justice for those who would otherwise be denied it for financial or other reasons. The foundation is funded through donations from Globalaw member firms and funds raised at Globalaw events. Visit www.globalaw.net for more information.

About Globalaw

Founded in 1994, Globalaw is a global Band 1 Chambers-ranked leading network of approximately 80 independent law firms and 4,000 lawyers in over 60 countries. Our mission is to foster seamless legal collaboration among member firms and assist them in delivering high-quality, cost-effective solutions to their clients worldwide. We take pride in our commitment to excellence, global reach, and innovative approach to legal services. Visit www.globalaw.net to learn more.